Facebook is like a clear plastic bag covering our Earth & Mark Zuckerberg is gradually smothering our freedom of speech & freedom of association with censorship & kicking people out.
From: Cris Ericson
879 Church Street
Chester, Vermont 05143-9375
August 2, 2021
TO: FEDERAL MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CHRIS M. McALILEY
WHO WAS ASSIGNED TO TRUMP v. FACEBOOK &
MARK ZUCKERBERG CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT
Trump v. Facebook, Inc. 21-cv-22440
U.S. Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley is available to handle
any or all proceedings in this case.
In the Court of Federal Judge Kathleen Mary Williams
Trump v facebook 21-cv-22440,
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida (Miami).
(1) I need to amend my previous letter sent certified mail;
(2) I need to explain why I request a subclass because I
feel that Laura Loomer and I are victims of crimes committed
by facebook.com and Mark Zuckerberg under
Title 18 U.S.C. Section 600;
(3) I need help to locate the other candidate(s);
(4) The Rules say you can request a subclass
but they don’t say how many people have to be
in a subclass & I was kicked off social media
and am having a hard time locating candidates.
(5) I forgot to sign with a personal signature my first letter,
and I also need an informa pauperis form so that the
attorneys who will be formally assigned to this case
after it is certified as a class action by the court
can not in the future demand payment from me.
(1) In my first certified letter I explained that I was the only candidate,
having found no others, who was on any official State Election Ballot
but was kicked off of facebook.com permanently before the
Nov. 3, 2020 General Election.
Because I am banned and censored from social media, I had a lot of
trouble trying to find other candidates with the same complaint of
winning a State Primary Election but being banned from
facebook.com prior to the Nov. 3, 2020 General Election.
I have now located another, of a different political party,
but the telephone number the Florida Secretary of State
Elections Division provides for 2020 candidate Laura Loomer does not allow a
voice message, nor does anyone answer.
I called the GOP Chairman for the area of Florida I think
this candidate is in, and left a message
with the secretary at the law firm he works for, hoping he will call
the candidate, Laura Loomer, and ask her to call me. Michael A. Barnett, Esq. – Shiner Law Group
Mr. Barnett currently serves as the Chairman of the
Republican Party of Palm Beach County, Florida.
Laura Loomer was on the Florida Republican ballot
for U.S. Congress in her Congressional District, and I was on the
Progressive Party official election ballot in the State of Vermont for the Nov. 3, 2020
Election. The Progressive Party in the State of Vermont
is a major political party and I won the primary for five (5)
statewide offices, which is allowed in the State of Vermont.
Despite the political opinion differences between myself and
Laura Loomer, we have one complaint in common: we both
won a Primary Election in each of our States and we both
were kicked off of facebook.com prior to the Nov. 3, 2020
General Election which made each of us lose votes and
lose the Election in favor of Democrats who won each
elected office we were running for.
(2) I believe Laura Loomer and I are victims of crime
under Title 18 U.S.C. Section 600 because
in former President Donald Trump’s Brief
Trump v. Facebook, Inc. 21-cv-22440
his attorney explains that members of the U.S. House
of Representatives in the United States Congress
directly or indirectly promised facebook.com and
Mark Zuckerberg the continued benefit of
Title 47 U.S.C. Section 230, a benefit made possible
by an Act of Congress, for the consideration of
deplatforming and censoring political candidates
who were not Democrats or who did not adhere to
the Democratic Party platform; and these actions
violate Title 18 U.S.C. Section 600:
Whoever, directly or indirectly, promises any
benefit, provided for or made possible in whole or
in part by any Act of Congress, to any person
(facebook.com is a corporate “person”)
as consideration for any political activity in
opposition to any candidate or any political party
in connection with any primary or general election to any
political office shall be fined under this title…
In the Brief before
Judge Kathleen Mary Williams
Trump v facebook 21-cv-22440,
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida (Miami)
submitted by former President Trump’s legal counsel,
Matthew Lee Baldwin, Esq., Florida Bar No. 27463,
he states that Facebook.com and Mark Zuckerberg have millions
of followers worldwide and receive billions of dollars a year in profits.
There is no indication that the foreign money earned is separated
from money earned from U.S. Citizens or people who qualify with
“green cards” to donate to political action committees.
Therefore, it appears that facebook.com and Mark Zuckerberg
are operating a worldwide political action committee with the
clear intent to promote some political candidates while
discouraging voters from voting for others,
like me and Laura Loomer;
and this appears to clearly violate Federal Election Law:
Title 52 U.S.C. Section 30121 (a) Prohibition.
It shall be unlawful for (1) a foreign national,
directly or indirectly, to make (A) a contribution
or other thing of value in connection with a
Federal, State, or local election; …
Allowing some political candidates to be promoted by
facebook.com and Mark Zuckerberg while simultaneously
banning other candidates and NOT filing with the
Federal Election Commission as an illegal and
unregistered worldwide political action committee
accepting foreign funds as facebook.com profits from
foreigners, and not segregating those funds,
certainly sounds like a crime to me.
(3) Would the Court please forward this letter to
candidate Laura Loomer, who like me, is running
for political office again in 2022, and ask her if she
would be willing to join me in a subclass
in this class action lawsuit? I do not know how
to contact her. Please explain to her that we must
ignore our political party affiliation and political
issue position differences and
focus on our common complaint of being bannned
and censored by social media, including
facebook.com and Mark Zuckerberg.
(4) I believe my specific complaint falls under the Rule
to create a subclass if you would please allow it.
Rule 23. Class Actions (c)(5) Subclasses.
When appropriate, a class may be divided
into subclasses that are each
treated as a class under this rule.
(5) I am a widow, age 69, living below the poverty level
so I believe I may qualify for an informa pauperis form
to avoid Court fees and costs of litigation.
I have a legal right to be a political candidate even
though I am poor, and I have a right to vote even
though I am poor. Facebook.com and Mark Zuckerberg
are essentially, in my opinion, creating a “poll tax”
by banning me permanently because I have been
a perennial political candidate every two years starting
2002 and I have never paid them any money.
They have committed contract fraud in my opinion
where there has been no “meeting of minds” and
they have taken my personal information and photos
and banned me permanently without any opportunity
for appeal in October 2020 prior to the Nov. 3, 2020
General Election. Facebook.com and Mark Zuckerberg
have kicked me out of facebook.com repeatedly by
demanding captchas I could not do; and by demanding
I identify friends in childhood photos of them in
their Halloween costumes, including friends I met as
adults and could not possibly identify as children
in Halloween costumes; and facebook.com has repeatedly
informed me I have too many friends when I only had
about 35 friends and other people have hundreds or
thousands of friends; etc., the list of harrassment
goes on and on, while meanwhile, they take all of
my personal information and photos and do not give me
any fair share of benefits for what they have taken
from me. In this past year that they have permanently
banned me, I have suffered the loss of social interaction
with family and friends during the covid-19 pandemic.
I feel abused as a senior citizen. Also, I believe
facebook.com and Mark Zuckerberg have a business, or at
least a facebook.com relationship with VERMONT PBS
which refused to include me in political candidate
debates in 2018. I filed a complaint with the Federal
Elections Commission and they sent me a letter stating
that they were going to use their prosecutorial discretion
to do nothing about it. FED M.U.R. # 7619
www.fec.gov › files › legal › murs › 7619 › 7619_02
RE: MUR 7619. Dear Ms. Groschner: The Federal Election Commission received a complaint that indicates Vermont ETV, Inc. d/b/a Vermont PBS may have violated …
BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 1 2 … – FEC
www.fec.gov › files › legal › murs › 7619 › 7619_06
MUR: 7619. Respondent: Vermont ETV, Inc. d/b/a. 6. Vermont Public Broadcasting System1. 7. 8. Complaint Receipt Date: June 21, 2019.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION July 9, 2019 VIA EMAIL … – FEC
www.fec.gov › files › legal › murs › 7619 › 7619_04
Jul 9, 2019 · RE: MUR 7619. Vermont ETV, Inc. d/b/a Vermont PBS. Dear Mr. Deutsch: This is in response to your e-mail dated July 8, 2019, requesting an …
I sincerely hope that this Court
is more concerned with Freedom of Speech and Freedom of
Association guaranteed to us by the United States Constitution.
The Graveyard in Chester, Vermont 05143 in
which my own mother is buried is full of graves of our own
brave soliders BURIED IN THE 1700s and 1800s
with flags next to them. WAKE UP AMERICA!
879 CHURCH STREET
CHESTER, VERMONT 05143-9375
LAND LINE TELEPHONE (802)875-4038