NOVEMBER 18, 2018 HOUSE FREEDOM CAUCUS HAS 2 MONTHS TO FIX NATIONAL DEBT CRISIS

NOVEMBER 18, 2018

To: THE HOUSE FREEDOM CAUCUS
and U.S. Congressman Mark Meadows
of North Carolina (Republican) —-
YOU HAVE 2 MONTHS LEFT TO
REDUCE THE NATIONAL DEBT!

PART 1)
We must demand taxpayers own a share of the profits
for all prescription drugs and medical devices
for which taxpayers paid for the research, design and development under U.S. Copyright work made for hire laws which give ownership of all drawings, diagrams and blueprints to the party who paid for the research, and in our case, this is the U.S. Taxpayer.

The U.S. Taxpayer should be the owner of the U.S. Copyrights which are then used to apply for the U.S. Patents.
In our case of taxpayers paying for research,
design and development of new prescription drugs and medical devices, the taxpayers should own a share of the profits which
pharmaceutical corporations make because we, the
taxpayers, paid for the underlying patents and copyrights,
and therefore we deserve “R.O.I.” return on investment.

The government shouldn’t be handing out taxpayer dollars
for research, design and development of new prescription
drugs and medical devices which are used by
profit-making pharmaceutical corporations
to manufacture products and sell the drugs and devices
worldwide for Trillions of dollars in profit,
without a return on our investment! “R.O.I.”

The pharmaceutical companies claim the ownership of the
Patents for all of the drugs and medical devices invented
for their benefit
using our tax dollars to pay for the research, but, under
U.S. Patent Laws, the taxpayers should rightfully
own a share of the profits of all sales of all of the
prescription drugs and medical devices sold
which were invented using taxpayer dollars
because it all starts with drawings and diagrams and
illustrations and blueprints which fall squarely under
U.S. Copyright “work made for hire” laws which
give the party paying for the research the ownership
in the U.S. Copyrights which are then used to
make the Patents; and it is the taxpayers paying
for all of this, so the taxpayers deserve
“R.O.I.” return on investment.

PART 2) REDUCING THE NATIONAL DEBT

Our biggest expense is what is should be, national defense.
But, this valid expenditure for our U.S. Military has made some defense contractors mega-multi-millionaire, and even billionaires. That’s the part that makes no common sense,
particularly since our war Veterans are lacking a lot of
medical and dental treatment, and many are homeless.

WHAT ARE THE CURRENT FACTS ON HOMELESS
U.S. MILITARY VETERANS?

http://nchv.org/index.php/news/media/background_and_statistics/ ” U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) estimates that 40,056 Veterans are homeless on any given night.”…
…” more than 40,000 homeless Veterans receive compensation or pension benefits each month.”

WHERE WILL THE MONEY COME FROM TO BUILD VETERANS VILLAGES FOR HOMELESS US MILITARY VETERANS FROM ALL OVER THE USA, ALL 50,000 OF THEM?

The US Congress votes to give our tax dollars to the Pentagon and then the Pentagon hands our tax dollars out to various defense contractors like Lockheed and Boeing and then they use our tax dollars for research – design & development and then they invent new defense products using our tax dollars for research and then they sell the new defense products worldwide to our allies and then they pocket the trillions of dollars of profit.

What’s wrong with this?

We – the taxpayers – should receive “R.O.I.”
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
of part of the profits of all sales of
defense products to our allies world
wide because under US COPYRIGHT LAWS,
WORK MADE FOR HIRE LAWS, ALL PRODUCTS START WITH
DIAGRAMS, DRAWINGS AND BLUEPRINTS WHICH FALL
SQUARELY UNDER U.S. COPYRIGHT WORK MADE FOR HIRE LAWS,
AND THE U.S. TAXPAYERS PAID FOR THE WORK, SO THEY
DESERVE “R.O.I.” RETURN ON INVESTMENT.

Under US Patent law, where we paid for the UNDERLYING
U.S. COPYRIGHTS, DRAWINGS, BLUEPRINTS, DIAGRAMS
USED TO APPLY FOR THE U.S. PATENTS,
WE, THE TAXPAYERS should OWN a share of the
the profits on products we paid for the research,
design and development of.

“R.O.I.”
We, the people, demand return on investment!
WHERE’S OUR SHARE OF THE PROFIT?
IT SHOULD BE USED TO REDUCE THE NATIONAL DEBT.
IT COULD ALSO BE USED FOR HEALTHCARE,
EDUCATION, LOW COST HOUSING AND
INFRASTRUCTURE.

Cris Ericson
NOVEMBER 18, 2018

COMING SOON!!!
COMMUNITY ACCESS
TELEVISION SHOWS
WITH CRIS ERICSON
AND GUESTS
DISCUSSING POLITICS
http://www.politics2020.org
cell phone only receives text
messages:
1-802-289-1000

Advertisements

HOUSE FREEDOM CAUCUS HAS 2 MONTHS TO SOLVE NATIONAL DEBT CRISIS BEFORE DEMOCRATS TAKE CONTROL OF HOUSE

To: THE HOUSE FREEDOM CAUCUS
and U.S. Congressman Mark Meadows
of North Carolina (Republican) —-

YOU HAVE 2 MONTHS LEFT TO
REDUCE THE NATIONAL DEBT!

PART 1)
We must demand taxpayers own a share of the profits
for all prescription drugs and medical devices
for which taxpayers paid for the research, design and development under U.S. Copyright work made for hire laws which give ownership of all drawings, diagrams and blueprints to the party who paid for the research, and in our case, this is the U.S. Taxpayer.

The U.S. Taxpayer should be the owner of the U.S. Copyrights which are then used to apply for the U.S. Patents.
In our case of taxpayers paying for research,
design and development of new prescription drugs and medical devices, the taxpayers should own a share of the profits which
pharmaceutical corporations make because we, the
taxpayers, paid for the underlying patents and copyrights,
and therefore we deserve “R.O.I.” return on investment.

The government shouldn’t be handing out taxpayer dollars
for research, design and development of new prescription
drugs and medical devices which are used by
profit-making pharmaceutical corporations
to manufacture products and sell the drugs and devices
worldwide for Trillions of dollars in profit,
without a return on our investment! “R.O.I.”

The pharmaceutical companies claim the ownership of the
Patents for all of the drugs and medical devices invented
for their benefit
using our tax dollars to pay for the research, but, under
U.S. Patent Laws, the taxpayers should rightfully
own a share of the profits of all sales of all of the
prescription drugs and medical devices sold
which were invented using taxpayer dollars
because it all starts with drawings and diagrams and
illustrations and blueprints which fall squarely under
U.S. Copyright “work made for hire” laws which
give the party paying for the research the ownership
in the U.S. Copyrights which are then used to
make the Patents; and it is the taxpayers paying
for all of this, so the taxpayers deserve
“R.O.I.” return on investment.

PART 2) REDUCING THE NATIONAL DEBT

Our biggest expense is what is should be, national defense.
But, this valid expenditure for our U.S. Military has made some defense contractors mega-multi-millionaire, and even billionaires. That’s the part that makes no common sense,
particularly since our war Veterans are lacking a lot of
medical and dental treatment, and many are homeless.

WHAT ARE THE CURRENT FACTS ON HOMELESS
U.S. MILITARY VETERANS?

http://nchv.org/index.php/news/media/background_and_statistics/ ” U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) estimates that 40,056 Veterans are homeless on any given night.”…
…” more than 40,000 homeless Veterans receive compensation or pension benefits each month.”

WHERE WILL THE MONEY COME FROM TO BUILD VETERANS VILLAGES FOR HOMELESS US MILITARY VETERANS FROM ALL OVER THE USA, ALL 50,000 OF THEM?

The US Congress votes to give our tax dollars to the Pentagon and then the Pentagon hands our tax dollars out to various defense contractors like Lockheed and Boeing and then they use our tax dollars for research – design & development and then they invent new defense products using our tax dollars for research and then they sell the new defense products worldwide to our allies and then they pocket the trillions of dollars of profit.

What’s wrong with this?

We – the taxpayers – should receive “R.O.I.”
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
of part of the profits of all sales of
defense products to our allies world
wide because under US COPYRIGHT LAWS,
WORK MADE FOR HIRE LAWS, ALL PRODUCTS START WITH
DIAGRAMS, DRAWINGS AND BLUEPRINTS WHICH FALL
SQUARELY UNDER U.S. COPYRIGHT WORK MADE FOR HIRE LAWS,
AND THE U.S. TAXPAYERS PAID FOR THE WORK, SO THEY
DESERVE “R.O.I.” RETURN ON INVESTMENT.

Under US Patent law, where we paid for the UNDERLYING
U.S. COPYRIGHTS, DRAWINGS, BLUEPRINTS, DIAGRAMS
USED TO APPLY FOR THE U.S. PATENTS,
WE, THE TAXPAYERS should OWN a share of the
the profits on products we paid for the research,
design and development of.

“R.O.I.”
We, the people, demand return on investment!
WHERE’S OUR SHARE OF THE PROFIT?
IT SHOULD BE USED TO REDUCE THE NATIONAL DEBT.
IT COULD ALSO BE USED FOR HEALTHCARE,
EDUCATION, LOW COST HOUSING AND
INFRASTRUCTURE.

Cris Ericson
http://www.politics2020.org
cell phone only receives text
messages:
1-802-289-1000

RED, WHITE & BLUE to: BLACK & BLUE & RED excluding candidates from debates is Un-American!

From: Cris Ericson
crisericson7@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018
Subject:
RED, WHITE & BLUE to: BLACK & BLUE & RED:
excluding candidates from debates is Un-American!

There were many “guilty” parties
excluding political candidates
from debates in the 2018 election
in the State of Vermont.

They should be stripped of their
taxpayer funding as “non-profits”
which actually act as political
action committees determined to
fraudulently affect the outcome
of the election by trying to make
voters think only certain candidates
are on the ballot, while in reality,
there are other candidates on
the ballot who are being denied
an equal opportunity to express
their freedom of speech and
freedom of association with
Vermont registered voters.

Cris Ericson was denied access
to some debates but still received
over 9,000 votes and over 3% of the
total vote for Representative to
the United States Congress
in the 2018 election.

She would have received
more votes if she had
not been denied
participation in some debates.

Denying all candidates participation
in all debates is a form of
“political racism” whereby only
the “Red” Republicans and “Blue”
Democrats are invited to the most
debates, and the “White” Independent
and minor party
candidates, like Cris Ericson,
are excluded from some debates.
This is “political racism” and discrimination
by color representing their political
affiliation.

In the 2018 political race in Vermont,
Vermont PBS and Vermont Public Radio
and others claiming to be “non-profits”
received taxpayer funding through
Public Broadcasting and the State of
Vermont, and then proceeded to
violate the rights of freedom of speech
and freedom of association to the
candidates they determined were
the wrong color political party affiliation.

Our American Flag was
Red, White and Blue,
and now is it Black & Blue & Red,
beaten by abuse and by the
“color of authority” because
incumbent Governor Phil Scott
and incumbent U.S. Congressman
Peter Welch co-conspired,
under their “color of authority”
to deny 2018 candidate Cris Ericson
the right to participate in some
political debates which were at
least in part funded with state and
federal taxpayer dollars.

crisericson7@gmail.com

RED, WHITE & BLUE to: BLACK & BLUE & RED excluding candidates from debates is Un-American!

There were many “guilty” parties
excluding political candidates
from debates in the 2018 election
in the State of Vermont.
They should be stripped of their
taxpayer funding as “non-profits”
which actually act as political
action committees determined to
fraudulently affect the outcome
of the election by trying to make
voters think only certain candidates
are on the ballot, while in reality,
there are other candidates on
the ballot who are being denied
an equal opportunity to express
their freedom of speech and
freedom of association with
Vermont registered voters.

Cris Ericson was denied access
to debates but still received over
9,000 votes and over 3% of the
total vote for Representative to
the United States Congress
in the 2018 election. She would
have received more votes if
she had not been denied
participation in debates.

Denying all candidates participation
in all debates is a form of
“political racism” whereby only
the Red Republicans and Blue
Democrats are invited to the most
debates, and the White Independent
candidates, like Cris Ericson,
and other minor party candidates,
are excluded. This is
“political racism” and discrimination
by color.

In the 2018 political race in Vermont,
Vermont PBS and Vermont Public Radio
and others claiming to be “non-profits”
received taxpayer funding through
Public Broadcasting and the State of
Vermont, and then proceeded to
violate the rights of freedom of speech
and freedom of association to the
candidates they determined were
the wrong color.

Our American Flag was
Red, White and Blue,
and now is it Black & Blue & Red,
beaten by abuse and by the
“color of authority” because
incumbent Governor Phil Scott
and incumbent U.S. Congressman
Peter Welch co-conspired,
under their “color of authority”
to deny 2018 candidate Cris Ericson
the right to participate in
political debates which were at
least in part funded with state and
federal taxpayer dollars.

crisericson7@gmail.com

VOTE for CRIS ERICSON in VERMONT, YOU WILL LOVE HER!

VOTE for CRIS ERICSON in VERMONT, YOU WILL LOVE HER!
VERMONTERS LOVE CRIS!

CRIS ERICSON is on the official Nov. 6, 2018
general election ballot in Vermont for
Governor and for US Congress.

The US Congress votes to give Billions
of our taxpayer dollars to the Pentagon and
the N.I.H, National Institute of health,
and they give our money to defense contractors
and pharmaceutical corporations who use
our money to make TRILLIONS $$$$$$$$$$$$
of dollars for themselves.
Because they are using our taxpayer dollars
to make a profit, we deserve a share!!!!!!!!!!!

39.1 Billion to N.I.H. (National Institute of Health)
plus 716 Billion to the US Military (Pentagon)
= 755.1 Billion dollars which is turned into
TRILLIONS $$$$$$$$$$ of dollars in profit
for defense contractors and pharmaceutical
corporations.

Divide their profit by 50 states and each
state should receive the equivalent of a
tax dividend if they had bought shares of
stock in these corporations and defense
contractors.

(1) We must demand Vermont members of the
United States Congress,
sponsor a new Bill with a NEW DEAL so
that taxpayers own a share
of the profits for all of their taxpayer dollars
the U.S. Congress votes to give to the
N.I.H., National Institute of Health, which then
gives millions and millions of dollars to
various pharmaceutical corporations
for research, design and development of
new prescriptions and medical devices,
which the pharmaceutical corporations then
sell worldwide for trillions of dollars in profit
which they are currently keeping for themselves,
making the rich richer, and the poor poorer.

We, the taxpayers, paid for the research,
design and development of these new
prescription drugs and medical devices
so we deserve a return on our investment,
“R.O.I.”

When a person buys shares of stock
in any of these pharmaceutical corporations,
they get a return on their investment called a
dividend.

We, the taxpayers, must demand equal rights,
a return on our investment, “R.O.I.”
to be paid to the 50 states
for health, education, low income housing,
cleaner, fresher, purer drinking water,
infrastructure – roads and bridges,
and all needs of the people that government
should provide for the common welfare,
health and safety of the citizens.

WHEN TAXPAYERS PAY FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT,
AND RECEIVE NO RETURN FOR THEIR
INVESTMENT, BUT THE WEALTHY
PEOPLE WHO BUY SHARES OF STOCK
IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATIONS
DO RECEIVE “R.O.I.”, A RETURN ON
INVESTMENT IN THE FORM OF STOCK
DIVIDEND CHECKS PAID TO THEM,
THEN IN REALITY,
THE TAXPAYERS HAVE PAID FOR
THE STOCK DIVIDENDS ISSUED TO
THE RICH PEOPLE,
SO THE POOR WORKERS GET POORER,
AND THE RICH PEOPLE GET RICHER.

The legal argument for this is that the
general intent of U.S. Copyright
and U.S. Patent Laws
is that the people paying for R & D
(research and development of new products)
should own the Copyright, which is the
design or drawing of a new product,
under US Copyright Law work made for hire laws,
so then they have a right to ownership in the Patent
for the product built on the chemical design,
blueprint
or drawing of a physical object,
and then in the products based on those
blueprints, drawings, diagrams and designs
which are sold,
so WE THE PEOPLE
WHOSE TAX DOLLARS PAID FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
have a right to the share of profits!

The US Senate passed a spending bill August 23, 2018
allotting $39.1 billion to the National Institutes of Health (N.I.H.) for the 2019 fiscal year starting on October 1.
This is a 5.4 percent increase, or $2 billion more than fiscal year 2018. THESE TAXPAYER DOLLARS CAME OUT OF YOUR PAYCHECK!
The National Institute of Health will give your tax dollars
to pharmaceutical corporations who will make TRILLIONS
of dollars in profit USING YOUR TAX DOLLARS,
so YOU deserve a share of the profit!
Right now, YOU are getting ripped off!

Everyone who buys shares of stock in the pharmacuetical
corporations expects a share of the profit for their
investment. Taxpayers deserve the same rights!
WHERE IS OUR SHARE OF THE PROFIT OF THE
TRILLIONS $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ OF DOLLARS
PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATIONS
MAKE USING OUR TAX DOLLARS?

2) Our biggest expense is what is should be,
national defense.
But, this valid expenditure for our U.S. Military
has made some defense contractors
mega-multi-millionaire, and even billionaires.
That’s the part that makes no common
sense, particularly since our war Veterans
are lacking a lot of medical and dental
treatment, and many are homeless.

June 2018, US Congress gives the US Military
(Pentagon) $716 BILLION dollars – your taxpayer
dollars.

Taxpayers pay taxes, the U.S. Congress votes to
give billions of tax dollars to the Pentagon,
then the Pentagon gives millions and
millions of your tax dollars to defense contractors
for research, design and development
of new weapons systems
and improvements of existing weapons
and jets, drones and bombs.
Then the defense contractors sell the new weapons
to our allies worldwide and make
TRILLIONS $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
of dollars of profits for themselves.

The legal argument for this is that the
general intent of U.S. Copyright
and U.S. Patent Laws
is that the people paying for R & D
(research and development of new products)
should own the Copyright, which is the
design or drawing of a new product,
under US Copyright Law work made for hire laws,
so then they have a right to ownership in the Patent
for the product built on the chemical design,
blueprint
or drawing of a physical object,
and then in the products based on those
COPYRIGHTED
blueprints, drawings, diagrams and designs
which are sold,
so WE THE PEOPLE
WHOSE TAX DOLLARS PAID FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
have a right to the share of profits!

Vermont’s members of the United States Congress,
House and Senate, should
sponsor a Bill to demand that
We, the taxpayers, are treated with equal rights
like people who buy shares of stock in the
defense corporations and receive dividends;
we must demand a
a return on our investment of our taxpayer
dollars given to defense contractors, “R.O.I.”

WHEN TAXPAYERS PAY FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT,
AND RECEIVE NO RETURN FOR THEIR
INVESTMENT, BUT THE WEALTHY
PEOPLE WHO BUY SHARES OF STOCK
IN THE DEFENSE CONTRACTORS
DO RECEIVE “R.O.I.”, A RETURN ON
INVESTMENT IN THE FORM OF STOCK
DIVIDEND CHECKS PAID TO THEM,
THEN IN REALITY,
THE TAXPAYERS HAVE PAID FOR
THE STOCK DIVIDENDS ISSUED TO
THE RICH PEOPLE,
SO THE POOR WORKERS GET POORER,
AND THE RICH PEOPLE GET RICHER.

Again, our share, as taxpayers paying for the R&D,
research, design and development,
could be paid to the 50 states
for health, education, low income housing,
cleaner, fresher, purer drinking water,
infrastructure – roads and bridges,
and all needs of the people that government
should provide for the common welfare,
health and safety of the citizens.

(3) We must demand that Vermont’s Representatives
to the United States Congress,
sponsor a Bill to require that:
(a) Any entitity, corporation, non-profit,
university or college that receives
taxpayer dollars
should not pay anyone a salary higher
than the equivalent salary paid to a
government employee; and
(b) because, under current law,
low income people who apply for benefits
like food stamps and medicaid must divulge
all of their bank accounts and assets
under penalty of perjury,
therefore,
people who run non-profit organizations,
universities and colleges
should be held to the same
standards as poor people
when taxpayers fund the
non-profit organizations,
colleges and universities;
so they should be required to also
reveal, under penalty of perjury,
all of their assets, property,
and bank accounts in order to qualify
and prove they actually need taxpayer
dollars to fund their organizations.

Cris Ericson
879 Church Street
Chester, Vermont 05143
(802)875-4038
crisericson7@gmail.com

In the news nationwide:
Cris Ericson’s proposal for a governor’s pardon tv show
Vermont Candidate Promises Weekly ‘Governor’s Pardon TV Show … Latest Boise & Treasure Valley News | Idaho Statesman
https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Nation & World News | The State
https://www.thestate.com/news/nation-world/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Breaking & Latest News | The Tribune
https://www.sanluisobispo.com/latest-news/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Latest KC News | The Kansas City Star
https://www.kansascity.com/news/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Latest Bradenton FL & Southwest Florida News | Bradenton Herald https://www.bradenton.com/news/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont, said in a PBS video that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Nation & World News | Lexington Herald Leader
https://www.kentucky.com/news/nation-world/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Latest South Mississippi News | The Sun Herald
https://www.sunherald.com/news/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Nation & World News | The Sacramento Bee
https://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

VOTE for CRIS ERICSON because Vermont Cows Love Her!

CRIS ERICSON is on the official Nov. 6, 2018
general election ballot in Vermont for
Governor and for US Congress.

The US Congress votes to give Billions
of our taxpayer dollars to the Pentagon and
the N.I.H, National Institute of health,
and they give our money to defense contractors
and pharmaceutical corporations who use
our money to make TRILLIONS $$$$$$$$$$$$
of dollars for themselves.
Because they are using our taxpayer dollars
to make a profit, we deserve a share!!!!!!!!!!!

39.1 Billion to N.I.H. (National Institute of Health)
plus 716 Billion to the US Military (Pentagon)
= 755.1 Billion dollars which is turned into
TRILLIONS $$$$$$$$$$ of dollars in profit
for defense contractors and pharmaceutical
corporations.

Divide their profit by 50 states and each
state should receive the equivalent of a
tax dividend if they had bought shares of
stock in these corporations and defense
contractors.

(1) We must demand Vermont members of the
United States Congress,
sponsor a new Bill with a NEW DEAL so
that taxpayers own a share
of the profits for all of their taxpayer dollars
the U.S. Congress votes to give to the
N.I.H., National Institute of Health, which then
gives millions and millions of dollars to
various pharmaceutical corporations
for research, design and development of
new prescriptions and medical devices,
which the pharmaceutical corporations then
sell worldwide for trillions of dollars in profit
which they are currently keeping for themselves,
making the rich richer, and the poor poorer.

We, the taxpayers, paid for the research,
design and development of these new
prescription drugs and medical devices
so we deserve a return on our investment,
“R.O.I.”

When a person buys shares of stock
in any of these pharmaceutical corporations,
they get a return on their investment called a
dividend.

We, the taxpayers, must demand equal rights,
a return on our investment, “R.O.I.”
to be paid to the 50 states
for health, education, low income housing,
cleaner, fresher, purer drinking water,
infrastructure – roads and bridges,
and all needs of the people that government
should provide for the common welfare,
health and safety of the citizens.

WHEN TAXPAYERS PAY FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT,
AND RECEIVE NO RETURN FOR THEIR
INVESTMENT, BUT THE WEALTHY
PEOPLE WHO BUY SHARES OF STOCK
IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATIONS
DO RECEIVE “R.O.I.”, A RETURN ON
INVESTMENT IN THE FORM OF STOCK
DIVIDEND CHECKS PAID TO THEM,
THEN IN REALITY,
THE TAXPAYERS HAVE PAID FOR
THE STOCK DIVIDENDS ISSUED TO
THE RICH PEOPLE,
SO THE POOR WORKERS GET POORER,
AND THE RICH PEOPLE GET RICHER.

The legal argument for this is that the
general intent of U.S. Copyright
and U.S. Patent Laws
is that the people paying for R & D
(research and development of new products)
should own the Copyright, which is the
design or drawing of a new product,
under US Copyright Law work made for hire laws,
so then they have a right to ownership in the Patent
for the product built on the chemical design,
blueprint
or drawing of a physical object,
and then in the products based on those
blueprints, drawings, diagrams and designs
which are sold,
so WE THE PEOPLE
WHOSE TAX DOLLARS PAID FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
have a right to the share of profits!

The US Senate passed a spending bill August 23, 2018
allotting $39.1 billion to the National Institutes of Health (N.I.H.) for the 2019 fiscal year starting on October 1.
This is a 5.4 percent increase, or $2 billion more than fiscal year 2018. THESE TAXPAYER DOLLARS CAME OUT OF YOUR PAYCHECK!
The National Institute of Health will give your tax dollars
to pharmaceutical corporations who will make TRILLIONS
of dollars in profit USING YOUR TAX DOLLARS,
so YOU deserve a share of the profit!
Right now, YOU are getting ripped off!

Everyone who buys shares of stock in the pharmacuetical
corporations expects a share of the profit for their
investment. Taxpayers deserve the same rights!
WHERE IS OUR SHARE OF THE PROFIT OF THE
TRILLIONS $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ OF DOLLARS
PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATIONS
MAKE USING OUR TAX DOLLARS?

2) Our biggest expense is what is should be,
national defense.
But, this valid expenditure for our U.S. Military
has made some defense contractors
mega-multi-millionaire, and even billionaires.
That’s the part that makes no common
sense, particularly since our war Veterans
are lacking a lot of medical and dental
treatment, and many are homeless.

June 2018, US Congress gives the US Military
(Pentagon) $716 BILLION dollars – your taxpayer
dollars.

Taxpayers pay taxes, the U.S. Congress votes to
give billions of tax dollars to the Pentagon,
then the Pentagon gives millions and
millions of your tax dollars to defense contractors
for research, design and development
of new weapons systems
and improvements of existing weapons
and jets, drones and bombs.
Then the defense contractors sell the new weapons
to our allies worldwide and make
TRILLIONS $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
of dollars of profits for themselves.

The legal argument for this is that the
general intent of U.S. Copyright
and U.S. Patent Laws
is that the people paying for R & D
(research and development of new products)
should own the Copyright, which is the
design or drawing of a new product,
under US Copyright Law work made for hire laws,
so then they have a right to ownership in the Patent
for the product built on the chemical design,
blueprint
or drawing of a physical object,
and then in the products based on those
COPYRIGHTED
blueprints, drawings, diagrams and designs
which are sold,
so WE THE PEOPLE
WHOSE TAX DOLLARS PAID FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
have a right to the share of profits!

Vermont’s members of the United States Congress,
House and Senate, should
sponsor a Bill to demand that
We, the taxpayers, are treated with equal rights
like people who buy shares of stock in the
defense corporations and receive dividends;
we must demand a
a return on our investment of our taxpayer
dollars given to defense contractors, “R.O.I.”

WHEN TAXPAYERS PAY FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT,
AND RECEIVE NO RETURN FOR THEIR
INVESTMENT, BUT THE WEALTHY
PEOPLE WHO BUY SHARES OF STOCK
IN THE DEFENSE CONTRACTORS
DO RECEIVE “R.O.I.”, A RETURN ON
INVESTMENT IN THE FORM OF STOCK
DIVIDEND CHECKS PAID TO THEM,
THEN IN REALITY,
THE TAXPAYERS HAVE PAID FOR
THE STOCK DIVIDENDS ISSUED TO
THE RICH PEOPLE,
SO THE POOR WORKERS GET POORER,
AND THE RICH PEOPLE GET RICHER.

Again, our share, as taxpayers paying for the R&D,
research, design and development,
could be paid to the 50 states
for health, education, low income housing,
cleaner, fresher, purer drinking water,
infrastructure – roads and bridges,
and all needs of the people that government
should provide for the common welfare,
health and safety of the citizens.

(3) We must demand that Vermont’s Representatives
to the United States Congress,
sponsor a Bill to require that:
(a) Any entitity, corporation, non-profit,
university or college that receives
taxpayer dollars
should not pay anyone a salary higher
than the equivalent salary paid to a
government employee; and
(b) because, under current law,
low income people who apply for benefits
like food stamps and medicaid must divulge
all of their bank accounts and assets
under penalty of perjury,
therefore,
people who run non-profit organizations,
universities and colleges
should be held to the same
standards as poor people
when taxpayers fund the
non-profit organizations,
colleges and universities;
so they should be required to also
reveal, under penalty of perjury,
all of their assets, property,
and bank accounts in order to qualify
and prove they actually need taxpayer
dollars to fund their organizations.

Cris Ericson
879 Church Street
Chester, Vermont 05143
(802)875-4038
crisericson7@gmail.com

IN THE NEWS NATIONWIDE OCT. 30, 2018
In the news nationwide:
Cris Ericson’s proposal for a governor’s pardon tv show
Vermont Candidate Promises Weekly ‘Governor’s Pardon TV Show … Latest Boise & Treasure Valley News | Idaho Statesman
https://www.idahostatesman.com/news/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Nation & World News | The State
https://www.thestate.com/news/nation-world/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Breaking & Latest News | The Tribune
https://www.sanluisobispo.com/latest-news/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Latest KC News | The Kansas City Star
https://www.kansascity.com/news/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Latest Bradenton FL & Southwest Florida News | Bradenton Herald https://www.bradenton.com/news/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont, said in a PBS video that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Nation & World News | Lexington Herald Leader
https://www.kentucky.com/news/nation-world/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Latest South Mississippi News | The Sun Herald
https://www.sunherald.com/news/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

Nation & World News | The Sacramento Bee
https://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/
Cris Ericson, Independent governor candidate in Vermont,
said in a PBS video
that she would host a governor’s pardon TV show
each Saturday night

CRIS ERICSON has the SHARPEST, BOLDEST, CLEAREST POLITICAL PLATFORM IN THE U.S.A.!!!

CRIS ERICSON HAS THE SHARPEST,
CLEAREST, BOLDEST 2018
POLITICAL PLATFORM
OF ANY CANDIDATE
IN THE U.S.A.!!!

CRIS ERICSON is on the official Nov. 6, 2018
general election ballot in Vermont for
Governor and for US Congress.

(1) We must demand Vermont members of the
United States Congress,
sponsor a new Bill with a NEW DEAL so
that taxpayers own a share
of the profits for all of their taxpayer dollars
the U.S. Congress votes to give to the
N.I.H., National Institute of Health, which then
gives millions and millions of dollars to
various pharmaceutical corporations
for research, design and development of
new prescriptions and medical devices,
which the pharmaceutical corporations then
sell worldwide for trillions of dollars in profit
which they are currently keeping for themselves,
making the rich richer, and the poor poorer.

We, the taxpayers, paid for the research,
design and development of these new
prescription drugs and medical devices
so we deserve a return on our investment,
“R.O.I.”

When a person buys shares of stock
in any of these pharmaceutical corporations,
they get a return on their investment called a
dividend.

We, the taxpayers, must demand equal rights,
a return on our investment, “R.O.I.”
to be paid to the 50 states
for health, education and needs of
the people.

WHEN TAXPAYERS PAY FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT,
AND RECEIVE NO RETURN FOR THEIR
INVESTMENT, BUT THE WEALTHY
PEOPLE WHO BUY SHARES OF STOCK
IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATIONS
DO RECEIVE “R.O.I.”, A RETURN ON
INVESTMENT IN THE FORM OF STOCK
DIVIDEND CHECKS PAID TO THEM,
THEN IN REALITY,
THE TAXPAYERS HAVE PAID FOR
THE STOCK DIVIDENDS ISSUED TO
THE RICH PEOPLE,
SO THE POOR WORKERS GET POORER,
AND THE RICH PEOPLE GET RICHER.

The legal argument for this is that the
general intent of U.S. Copyright
and U.S. Patent Laws
is that the people paying for R & D
(research and development of new products)
should own the Copyright, which is the
design or drawing of a new product,
under US Copyright Law work made for hire laws,
so then they have a right to ownership in the Patent
for the product built on the chemical design,
blueprint
or drawing of a physical object,
and then in the products based on those
blueprints, drawings, diagrams and designs
which are sold,
so WE THE PEOPLE
WHOSE TAX DOLLARS PAID FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
have a right to the share of profits!

2) Our biggest expense is what is should be,
national defense.
But, this valid expenditure for our U.S. Military
has made some defense contractors
mega-multi-millionaire, and even billionaires.
That’s the part that makes no common
sense, particularly since our war Veterans
are lacking a lot of medical and dental
treatment, and many are homeless.

Taxpayers pay taxes, the U.S. Congress votes to
give billions of tax dollars to the Pentagon,
then the Pentagon gives millions and
millions of your tax dollars to defense contractors
for research, design and development
of new weapons systems
and improvements of existing weapons
and jets, drones and bombs.
Then the defense contractors sell the new weapons
to our allies worldwide and make trillions of
dollars of profits for themselves.

The legal argument for this is that the
general intent of U.S. Copyright
and U.S. Patent Laws
is that the people paying for R & D
(research and development of new products)
should own the Copyright, which is the
design or drawing of a new product,
under US Copyright Law work made for hire laws,
so then they have a right to ownership in the Patent
for the product built on the chemical design,
blueprint
or drawing of a physical object,
and then in the products based on those
COPYRIGHTED
blueprints, drawings, diagrams and designs
which are sold,
so WE THE PEOPLE
WHOSE TAX DOLLARS PAID FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
have a right to the share of profits!

Vermont’s members of the United States Congress,
House and Senate, should
sponsor a Bill to demand that
We, the taxpayers, are treated with equal rights
like people who buy shares of stock in the
defense corporations and receive dividends;
we must demand a
a return on our investment of our taxpayer
dollars given to defense contractors, “R.O.I.”

WHEN TAXPAYERS PAY FOR THE
RESEARCH, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT,
AND RECEIVE NO RETURN FOR THEIR
INVESTMENT, BUT THE WEALTHY
PEOPLE WHO BUY SHARES OF STOCK
IN THE DEFENSE CONTRACTORS
DO RECEIVE “R.O.I.”, A RETURN ON
INVESTMENT IN THE FORM OF STOCK
DIVIDEND CHECKS PAID TO THEM,
THEN IN REALITY,
THE TAXPAYERS HAVE PAID FOR
THE STOCK DIVIDENDS ISSUED TO
THE RICH PEOPLE,
SO THE POOR WORKERS GET POORER,
AND THE RICH PEOPLE GET RICHER.

Again, our share, as taxpayers paying for the R&D,
research, design and development,
could be paid to the 50 states
for health, education and all needs of
the people.

(3) We must demand that Vermont’s Representatives
to the United States Congress,
sponsor a Bill to require that:
(a) Any entitity, corporation, non-profit,
university or college that receives
taxpayer dollars
should not pay anyone a salary higher
than the equivalent salary paid to a
government employee; and
(b) because, under current law,
low income people who apply for benefits
like food stamps and medicaid must divulge
all of their bank accounts and assets
under penalty of perjury,
therefore,
people who run non-profit organizations,
universities and colleges
should be held to the same
standards as poor people
when taxpayers fund the
non-profit organizations,
colleges and universities;
so they should be required to also
reveal, under penalty of perjury,
all of their assets, property,
and bank accounts in order to qualify
and prove they actually need taxpayer
dollars to fund their organizations.

Cris Ericson
879 Church Street
Chester, Vermont 05143
(802)875-4038
crisericson7@gmail.com
(802)875-4038
Text messages only to:
(802)289-1000