WORLD’S BEST POLITICAL PLATFORM! NEW SOLUTIONS TO TOP 3 ISSUES! VOTE CRIS ERICSON 2020

WORLD’S BEST POLITICAL PLATFORM!
NEW SOLUTIONS TO TOP 3 ISSUES!
VOTE CRIS ERICSON 2020

World’s Best Political Platform: Please Share with all Candidates for President!

WORLD’S BEST POLITICAL PLATFORM
WITH THE TOP 3 NEW SOLUTIONS!
This plan includes
(1) Education
(2) Health Care
(3) Global Warming

(1) EDUCATION? Demand R.O.I for Education!

We must demand a Return on Investment, R.O.I.
of our taxpayer dollars given to Defense Contractors
who use our money to make Trillions of dollars
for themselves, and give us no share of profits in return.
If our taxpayer dollars were spent to buy shares of
stock in these Defense Contractors, we would receive
Quarterly dividend paychecks.

Defense contractors receive our tax dollars because the
U.S. Congress votes to give our tax dollars to the Pentagon
and then the Pentagon gives millions and millions to
Defense Contractors for research, design and development,
R&D of new weapons systems, jets and drones and satellite
systems, and then they apply for the ownership of the
PATENTS, and then they sell these products worldwide
to our Allies for Trillions of dollars in profits.

A PATENT is the ownership certificate of the invention.
In PATENT law there is a concept of “work made for hire”
which means the persons paying for the work have a
right to ownership of the PATENT. We, the taxpayers,
paid for the research, design and development so we
have a right to co-ownership in the PATENT.

Cris Ericson is the only candidate telling you this!
Cris Ericson was born in Washington, D.C., the
daughter of a Patent Attorney who worked in the
U.S. Patent Office.

Because we, the tax payers, paid for the R&D, the research,
design and development of these new weapons systems,
we should OWN part of the PATENTS, and Cris Ericson
will submit a Bill to the U.S. Congress when she is
elected from Vermont 2020, demanding our
share of the profits which will pay for free college.

(2) HEALTH CARE? Demand R.O.I. for Health Care!

We must demand a Return on Investment, R.O.I.
of our taxpayer dollars given out by the N.I.H.
National Institute of Health, which gives the
money out for research to Universities
and pharmaceutical laboratories for research,
design and development, R&D,
on new medical devices and prescription drugs,
and then the Professor or Laboratory applies for
the PATENT, sometimes the University Professor
starts their very own pharmaceutical corporation,
and then these pharmaceutical coporations sell the
new prescriptions and medical devices world wide
making Trillions of dollars in profit, but they
do not give us any share of the profits even
though we, the taxpayers, paid for the research,
design and development, R&D.

If our taxpayer dollars were spent to buy
Shares of Stock in these
Universities whose professors use student labor,
and Pharmaceutical Laboratories,
which then PATENT the medical devices
and prescription drugs invented in their
laboratories, and then sell the PATENTS
to Pharmaceutical Corporations,
we would receive Quarterly dividend paychecks.

A PATENT is the ownership certificate of the invention.
In PATENT law there is a concept of “work made for hire”
which means the persons paying for the work have a
right to ownership of the PATENT. We, the taxpayers,
paid for the research, design and development so we
have a right to co-ownership in the PATENT.

Universities and medical research laboratories
receive our tax dollars because the
U.S. Congress votes to give our tax dollars to the N.I.H,
National Institute of Health,
and then the N.I.H gives millions and millions of dollars to University and pharmaceutical laboratories
for research, design and development,
R&D of new prescription drugs, and medical devices,
and then they apply for the ownership of the
PATENTS, and then they sell these products worldwide
for Trillions of dollars in profits.
Because we, the tax payers, paid for the R&D, the research,
design and development of these new weapons systems,
we should co-OWN part of the PATENTS, and Cris Ericson
will submit a Bill to the U.S. Congress, when she
is elected from Vermont 2020, demanding our
share of the profits which will help pay for
Health Care for all U.S. Citizens.

WHY HAS THE U.S. CONGRESS, HOUSE & SENATE,
NOT DONE ANYTHING TO DEMAND OUR RETURN ON
INVESTMENT OF OUR TAXPAYER DOLLARS?

They have a little money laundering scheme going on.
The Pentagon and the N.I.H. National Institute of
Health were created by the U.S. Congress to
facilitate this money laundering scheme.

The money, our taxpayer dollars, does not go
directly to Defense Contractors, it is sent first
to the Pentagon.

The money, our taxpayer dollars, does not go
directly to Pharmaceutical Corporations, it is
sent first to the National Institute of Health,
the N.I.H.

Then the Pentagon and N.I.H. hand out our money
to defense contractors and laboratories to pay
for their R&D research, design and development
of new medical and defense products.
Then they apply for the PATENTS and then sell the
products worldwide making trillions of dollars.

Then, the defense contractors and pharamceutical
corporations pay the Members of the United States
Congress, House & Senate with campaign donations
from the PACS, political action committees of the
defense contractors and pharmaceutical corporations.
The defense contractors and pharmaceutical
corporations also pay Lobbyists to wine and dine
the Members of the U.S. Congress.

That’s how this money laundring scheme has
quietly gone on for years and years,
with your taxpayer dollars being sent, by a VOTE
of the U.S. Congress to the Pentagon and N.I.H.,
and from there to defense contractors and
pharmaceutical corporations, and from there to
PACs, poliical action committees and Lobbyists,
and from there some of your taxpayer dollars are
deposited into the campaign war chests of the
Members of the U.S. Congress, House and Senate.

IT IS TIME TO STOP THIS MONEY LAUNDERING SCHEME!

(3) CLIMATE CHANGE & GLOBAL WARMING

Foreign countries use canals to re-route water to
keep areas from flooding.
Look at satellite images
of the Netherlands,
look at photos of Venice, Italy.
We can do this!

To get started, the U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers
can dig a canal following all along Interstate
Highway 10 all the way from Florida to California.
They must dig it wide enough and deep enough
to accomodate mating and breeding ocean whales.
This will create thousands of miles of new fishing
areas and new jobs fish farming lobsters and
cod and haddock and sea salmon, etc. Delicious!

Then, the overflow of salt water which will occur
during periods of global warming will be irrigated
into desalinization plants to create fresh water
which will be directed into irrigation ditches
for new farming areas and new jobs farming in
the deserts of Texas, New Mexico, Arizon and
southern California.

We are going to make lemonade from lemons.
Climate change and global warming will be
used to create new jobs in fishing
and farming, and a new whale route from
the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean
in a deep and wide canal all along
Interstate highway 10 from Florida to
California.

IF YOU AGREE WITH THESE POLITICAL ISSUES,
PLEASE HURRY AND HELP NOW!
THE VOTERS NEED TO HEAR THESE
IDEAS NOW!

Please send donation checks to:
Campaign to Elect Cris Ericson 2020
879 Church Street
Chester, Vermonnt 05143-9375
(802)875-4038

http://www.politics2020.org
Cris Ericson for U.S. Congress 2020
from Vermont
http://crisericson.com
1-802-289-1000 text messages only, please.
No data downloads.

WORLD’S BEST 2020 POLITICAL PLATFORM! VOTE CRIS ERICSON 2020 for US CONGRESS

WORLD’S BEST 2020 POLITICAL PLATFORM!
VOTE CRIS ERICSON 2020 for US CONGRESS

Please send a donation check right away to
Campaign to Elect Cris Ericson
if you agree with this political platform.
We need to get our message out
and share it everywhere!
Campaign to Elect Cris Ericson,
879 Church St., Chester, VT 05143 (802)875-4038

WORLD’S BEST POLITICAL PLATFORM

(1) COLLEGE EDUCATION? R.O.I. for College!

We must demand a Return on Investment, R.O.I.
of our taxpayer dollars given to Defense Contractors
who use our money to make Trillions of dollars
for themselves, and give us no share of profits in return.
If our taxpayer dollars were spent to buy shares of
stock in these Defense Contractors, we would receive
Quarterly dividend paychecks.

Defense contractors receive our tax dollars because the
U.S. Congress votes to give our tax dollars to the Pentagon
and then the Pentagon gives millions and millions to
Defense Contractors for research, design and development,
R&D of new weapons systems, jets and drones and satellite
systems, and then they apply for the ownership of the
PATENTS, and then they sell these products worldwide
to our Allies for Trillions of dollars in profits.

A PATENT is the ownership certificate of the invention.
In PATENT law there is a concept of “work made for hire”
which means the persons paying for the work have a
right to ownership of the PATENT. We, the taxpayers,
paid for the research, design and development so we
have a right to co-ownership in the PATENT.

Cris Ericson was born in Washington, D.C., the
daughter of a Patent Attorney who worked in the
U.S. Patent Office.

Because we, the tax payers, paid for the R&D, the research,
design and development of these new weapons systems,
we should OWN part of the PATENTS, and Cris Ericson
will submit a Bill to the U.S. Congress when she is
elected from Vermont 2020, demanding our
share of the profits which will pay for free college.

(2) HEALTH CARE? R.O.I. for Health Care!

We must demand a Return on Investment, R.O.I.
of our taxpayer dollars given out by the N.I.H.
National Institute of Health, which gives the
money out for research to Universities
and pharmaceutical laboratories for research,
design and development, R&D,
on new medical devices and prescription drugs,
and then the Professor or Laboratory applies for
the PATENT, sometimes the University Professor
starts their very own pharmaceutical corporation,
and then these pharmaceutical coporations sell the
new prescriptions and medical devices world wide
making Trillions of dollars in profit, but they
do not give us any share of the profits even
though we, the taxpayers, paid for the research,
design and development, R&D.

If our taxpayer dollars were spent to buy
Shares of Stock in these
Universities whose professors use student labor,
and Pharmaceutical Laboratories,
which then PATENT the medical devices
and prescription drugs invented in their
laboratories, and then sell the PATENTS
to Pharmaceutical Corporations,
we would receive Quarterly dividend paychecks.

A PATENT is the ownership certificate of the invention.
In PATENT law there is a concept of “work made for hire”
which means the persons paying for the work have a
right to ownership of the PATENT. We, the taxpayers,
paid for the research, design and development so we
have a right to co-ownership in the PATENT.

Universities and medical research laboratories
receive our tax dollars because the
U.S. Congress votes to give our tax dollars to the N.I.H,
National Institute of Health,
and then the N.I.H gives millions and millions of dollars to University and pharmaceutical laboratories
for research, design and development,
R&D of new prescription drugs, and medical devices,
and then they apply for the ownership of the
PATENTS, and then they sell these products worldwide
for Trillions of dollars in profits.
Because we, the tax payers, paid for the R&D, the research,
design and development of these new weapons systems,
we should co-OWN part of the PATENTS, and Cris Ericson
will submit a Bill to the U.S. Congress, when she
is elected from Vermont 2020, demanding our
share of the profits which will help pay for
Health Care for all U.S. Citizens.

WHY HAS THE U.S. CONGRESS, HOUSE & SENATE,
NOT DONE ANYTHING TO DEMAND OUR RETURN ON
INVESTMENT OF OUR TAXPAYER DOLLARS?

They have a little money laundering scheme going on.
The Pentagon and the N.I.H. National Institute of
Health were created by the U.S. Congress to
facilitate this money laundering scheme.

The money, our taxpayer dollars, does not go
directly to Defense Contractors, it is sent first
to the Pentagon.

The money, our taxpayer dollars, does not go
directly to Pharmaceutical Corporations, it is
sent first to the National Institute of Health,
the N.I.H.

Then the Pentagon and N.I.H. hand out our money
to defense contractors and laboratories.
They apply for the PATENTS and then sell
products worldwide making trillions of dollars.

Then, the defense contractors and pharamceutical
corporations pay the Members of the United States
Congress, House & Senate with campaign donations
from the PACS, political action committees of the
defense contractors and pharmaceutical corporations.
The defense contractors and pharmaceutical
corporations also pay Lobbyists to wine and dine
the Members of the U.S. Congress.

That’s how this money laundring scheme has
quietly gone on for years and years,
with your taxpayer dollars being sent, by a VOTE
of the U.S. Congress to the Pentagon and N.I.H.,
and from there to defense contractors and
pharmaceutical corporations, and from there to
PACs, poliical action committees and Lobbyists,
and from there some of your taxpayer dollars are
deposited into the campaign war chests of the
Members of the U.S. Congress, House and Senate.

IT IS TIME TO STOP THIS MONEY LAUNDERING SCHEME!

Cris Ericson 2020
http://politics2020.org
http://crisericson.com

CAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES WHO ARE EXCLUDED FROM DEBATES JOIN A LEGAL ACTION W/ AN INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE?

HAS YOUR FAVORITE DEMOCRATIC PARTY CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT
OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE
JANUARY 2020 POLITICAL DEBATE? WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT IT?

WILL THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY EVER BE ENTIRELY INCLUSIVE AND FAIR?

Could Democratic Party candidates for President of the United States of America, who have been excluded from debates jointly controlled by PBS, join the complaint of an independent candidate for U.S. Congress against Vermont PBS?

HAPPY NEW YEAR!
WILL 2020 BRING FAIRNESS TO POLITICS?

I want all Democratic Party candidates for President of the
United States of America to sit up and pay attention because you know that PBS is constantly asking for viewer donations, and you know that PBS most likely contributes to the
manipulation of the
criteria for debate participation, so ask yourselves,
how many of their donations are from foreigners, and
how much influence do the foreigners have in the manipulation of criteria for debate participation?

Isn’t that foreign influence in our elections if
that is what is going on, even if it is a small part?Cris Ericson filed her complaint to the Federal Election Commission
last summer 2019 before the Republican Commissioner resigned, leaving the FEC without the necessary Quorum of four Commissioners required to vote to send a complaint to the U.S. Attorney General or to vote to dismiss a complaint or to vote to take action on a complaint.

The FEC has 120 days to take action on a complaint,
and if they do not do it within that time frame,
then the party complaining can take legal action
in the United States District Court in
Washington, D.C. if they want to. Otherwise, they
sit and wait for the Federal Election Commission
to take action one way or another.

The file cabinets at the FEC might be full of
complaints asking questions about
foreign influence in elections,
but they might not be heard right now
because there is no Quorum of four Commissioners
to vote on the complaints that might exist or
to vote to send them to the U.S. Attorney General.
Isn’t it important right now to get any questions
about foreign influence in elections out for the
public to hear?

Cris Ericson’s complaint
has been sitting at the Federal Election Commission
since last summer, well over 120 days, but
she can not afford to take her complaint to the
United States District Court in Washington, D.C.
and the only way it could get there would be if
other candidates for Federal Office “join”
her complaint by filing with her to the
United States District Court in Washington, D.C.
with a pro-bono attorney representing them.

Cris Ericson filed her complaint to the Federal Election Commission last summer 2019 before the Republican Commissioner resigned, leaving the FEC without the necessary Quorum of four Commissioners required to vote to send a complaint to the U.S. Attorney General or to vote to dismiss a complaint or to vote to take action on a complaint.

When a complaint has just been sitting in some file
drawer at the FEC for over 120 days, then the person complaining has a legal right to re-file the complaint with the
United States District Court in Washington, D.C.
where other candidates for federal office
could “join” the complaint.

How many Democratic Party candidates for
President of the United States of America
are now complaining about being excluded
from political candidate debates which are
partly funded by PBS, which receives federal
tax dollars, and therefore should not

exclude any candidate from debates?
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/top-democratic-candidates-ask-dnc-change-debate-qualifying-rules

Could Democratic Party candidates for President of the United States, who are being excluded from political candidate debates by PBS, join a Vermont independent candidate who filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission against Vermont PBS for excluding her from 2018 political candidate debates even though she was on the official election ballot for the general election Nov. 6, 2018 in Vermont?

Isn’t the issue the same for all excluded candidates, that PBS is funded by tax dollars and therefore no candidate with ballot status, whether it is the primary election or the general election, should be excluded from any debates which are funded by PBS which is funded by taxpayer dollars?

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/top-democratic-candidates-ask-dnc-change-debate-qualifying-rules

Democratic Presidential candidates are complaining about debate exclusion by PBS News Hour & Politico.

What can be done?

Maybe they could “join” Cris Ericson’s complaint to the Federal Election Commission, which has not been resolved yet.
Matter Under Review, M.U.R. #7619

Cris Ericson was excluded from Vermont PBS
candidate debates in 2018 even though she was on the Nov. 6, 2018 Official Election Ballot in Vermont for United States Congress House of Representatives (and for Governor of Vermont as allowed by Vermont laws).

PBS is involved in all of these candidate complaints of debate exclusion for federal office, so even though Cris Ericson
is an independent candidate,
maybe they should all join Cris Ericson’s complaint!

The FEC is like a secret court
and the public can not know the outcome of the complaint
until it is settled. When the complaint is settled,
the public can search the outcome by searching
“closed enforcement matters” and entering
the “Matter Under Review” number: M.U.R. #7619

Confidentiality
http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/

To protect the interests of those involved in a complaint,
the law requires that any Commission action on a MUR
be kept strictly confidential until the case is resolved.
These provisions do not, however, prevent a complainant or respondent from disclosing the substance of the complaint itself
or the response to that complaint
or from engaging in conduct that leads to the publication
of information contained in the complaint.
Nevertheless, information about a Commission notification of findings or about a Commission investigation may not be disclosed,
unless the respondent waives his or her right to confidentiality in writing. Because the public has the right to know the outcome of any
enforcement proceeding,
a redacted case file is made available to the public in the Press Office and Office of Public Records within 30 days after the parties involved have been notified that the entire case has been closed. Closed case files are also available for review on the Commission’s website.

Federal Election Commission | United States of America

The Federal Election Commission administers and enforces the laws that govern the financing of elections for federal office—the U.S. House, Senate and President.
Other election-related laws are not within the FEC’s jurisdiction. Any person may file a complaint with the Commission
if he or she believes a violation of the federal election campaign lawsommission finds that a violation occurred,
possible outcomes can range from a letter reiterating compliance obligations to a conciliation agreement, which may include a monetary civil penalty. All FEC enforcement matters are kept confidential until they are resolved.

http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/

Office of General Counsel
Federal Election Commission
1050 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20463

http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/

In order for the complaint to be considered complete and proper, it should clearly recite the facts
that show specific violations under the Commission’s jurisdiction and clearly identify each person,
committee, group, or entity that is alleged to have committed a violation (the “respondent”).
Citations to the law and regulations are not required, but the complaint should include any
documentation supporting the allegations and differentiate between statements based
on the complainant’s personal knowledge and those based on information and belief.
Statements not based on personal knowledge should identify the source of the information.

Cris Ericson http://politics2020.org

FEC COMPLAINT: VERMONT PBS EXCLUDED CRIS ERICSON from 2018 DEBATES

FEC COMPLAINT: VERMONT PBS EXCLUDED CRIS ERICSON from 2018 DEBATES! Cris Ericson is now an independent candidate in Vermont for U.S. Congress 2020. Some 2020 Democratic Party candidates for President of the United States are now complaining about being excluded from debates.
What right does publicly funded PBS have to exclude ANY candidate? PBS is funded with public tax dollars!
What right do they have to exclude anyone?

Cris Ericson complained to the Federal Election Commission
that Vermont PBS excluded her from candidate debates in 2018 even though she was on the Nov. 6, 2018 official Election Ballot. The FEC is like a secret court
and the public can not know the outcome of the complaint
until it is settled. When the complaint is settled,
the public can search the outcome by searching
“closed enforcement matters” and entering
the “Matter Under Review” number: M.U.R. #7619

Confidentiality
http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/ To protect the interests of those involved in a complaint,
the law requires that any Commission action on a MUR
be kept strictly confidential until the case is resolved.
These provisions do not, however, prevent a complainant or respondent from disclosing the substance of the complaint itself
or the response to that complaint
or from engaging in conduct that leads to the publication
of information contained in the complaint.
Nevertheless, information about a Commission notification of findings or about a Commission investigation may not be disclosed,
unless the respondent waives his or her right to confidentiality in writing.

Because the public has the right to know the outcome of any
enforcement proceeding,
a redacted case file is made available to the public in the Press Office and Office of Public Records within 30 days after the parties involved have been notified that the entire case has been closed.
Closed case files are also available for review on the Commission’s website.

Federal Election Commission | United States of America
The Federal Election Commission administers and enforces the laws that govern the financing of elections for federal office—the U.S. House, Senate and President.
Other election-related laws are not within the FEC’s jurisdiction. Any person may file a complaint with the Commission
if he or she believes a violation of the federal election campaign laws or FEC regulations has occurred or is about to occur.
The Commission reviews every complaint filed.
If the Commission finds that a violation occurred,
possible outcomes can range from a letter reiterating compliance obligations to a conciliation agreement, which may include a monetary civil penalty. All FEC enforcement matters are kept confidential until they are resolved.

http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/ Office of General Counsel
Federal Election Commission
1050 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20463

http://www.fec.gov/legal-resources/enforcement/complaints-process/how-to-file-complaint-with-fec/ In order for the complaint to be considered complete and proper, it should clearly recite the facts
that show specific violations under the Commission’s jurisdiction and clearly identify each person,
committee, group, or entity that is alleged to have committed a violation (the “respondent”).
Citations to the law and regulations are not required, but the complaint should include any documentation supporting the allegations and differentiate between statements based on the complainant’s personal knowledge and those based on information and belief. Statements not based on personal knowledge should identify the source of the information.